To secure both AI technological advancement and safety, we need a rational and balanced regulatory framework that soberly assesses risks and encourages innovation, rather than relying on emotional, retaliatory regulations.
Imagine waking up in the morning and saying to your smartphone AI assistant, “Summarize the materials for this afternoon’s meeting.” The AI instantly understands dozens of pages of documents and highlights only the key points on your screen. Now, what if the government imposed complex censorship and restrictions every time tech companies trained their AI, citing the reason that “AI becoming too smart is dangerous”? The convenience we enjoy every day would likely have been delayed by a long time.
As artificial intelligence (AI) technology has made rapid strides recently, governments around the world are deeply conflicted about how to handle this new technology. An interesting confrontation is emerging in this process: one side argues that strong regulation is needed for safety, while the other warns that hasty regulation will cut off the flower of technological innovation before it can even bloom. Let’s look at why AI regulation should be a matter of rational judgment rather than emotional response.
Why is this important?
AI regulation goes beyond simple legal issues and is directly linked to our lives. AI is already deeply embedded in our daily routines, helping us in areas such as healthcare, finance, and transportation. If development is delayed due to misguided regulation, we lose the opportunity to use safer and smarter services. Conversely, if regulations are too loose and a security breach occurs, personal data or national systems could be exposed to significant threats.
Technological competition between nations is particularly intense. The AI strategy of the Donald Trump administration has focused on minimizing regulation and securing technological leadership for national competitiveness. Even rules meant to prevent serious risks, such as attacks on government systems using AI, have been adjusted on the grounds that they hinder innovation 23. Like this, regulation is the compass that determines the fate of technology. Humanity’s future can change significantly depending on which direction it is set.
Easy to understand: AI regulation is like a ‘chef’
Let’s compare AI regulation to ‘cooking’ to make it easier to understand.
Shall we call the development of AI technology ‘cooking’ a new recipe? Government regulation is the ‘kitchen rules’ the chef follows. If you make rules that are too strict (e.g., forbidding the use of knives entirely), the chef cannot create proper, delicious food. Conversely, if there are no rules at all, a fire could start during cooking, or unsanitary food could be produced.
The current problem is that the rules in kitchens around the world are too different. The European Union (EU) has been applying a powerful and common legal framework incrementally since August 2024 through the ‘Artificial Intelligence Act’ 5. Meanwhile, other countries have their own different standards. Because cultures and governing styles differ, AI policy proposals are flooding out, leaving the global regulatory environment in a chaotic state like a large, unorganized kitchen 6.
Tech giants like Mark Zuckerberg and Marc Andreessen warn in this situation that “hasty preemptive government regulation can cut off the sprouts of innovation” 1. In other words, tying things up tightly before problems even occur may not be the answer.
Current situation: Differences in perception and the regulatory dilemma
Perspectives on AI vary significantly from country to country. According to a 2022 Ipsos survey, 78% of Chinese citizens responded that “AI technology has more benefits than drawbacks,” while only 35% in the U.S. agreed 1. Because this gap in perception is so large, some countries view AI as a driving force for future growth and try to support it, while others view it as a risk factor and try to control it.
Experts often think that individuals and governments make rational choices by coldly weighing benefits and risks when adopting AI, but in reality, emotional and complex factors are intervening, making rational choices increasingly difficult 4. In particular, extreme responses—such as retaliatory regulation due to vague fear of technology, or conversely, making safety devices too easy to remove for fear of falling behind in competition—are pointed out as dangerous.
What will happen in the future?
Moving forward, ‘rational regulation’ that precisely manages the actual risks of technology will be key. The task is to create a balanced framework that does not merely take a retaliatory approach of “limiting technology,” but sternly handles actual threats like cyberattacks while encouraging healthy technological development 2. We should continuously pay attention to how these policy changes will affect the future of humanity through reports like the annual State of AI report 7.
Ultimately, what we desire is for AI to make our lives more convenient and enriched. Regulation should not be a barrier that hinders this, but should act like the lanes on a road that allow cars to drive safely. Just as you need lanes to gain speed without accidents, rational regulation will help us go further with AI.
MindTickleBytes’ AI Reporter Perspective
AI regulation is not a race of “who goes faster,” but a process of contemplating “how to go further and safely.” Only policies designed precisely with a cool head, excluding emotional fear or excessive optimism, will be the best solution for the coexistence of technology and humanity.
References
- Regulation of artificial intelligence - Wikipedia
-
[AI Regulation Should Be Rational, Not Retaliatory Electronic Frontier Foundation](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/06/ai-regulation-should-be-rational-not-retaliatory) - AI Regulation Should Be Rational, Not Retaliatory - vuink.com
- Not a Rational Choice: How AI (Regulation) is Eroding our …
- Artificial Intelligence Act - Wikipedia
- A Comprehensive Review and Systematic Analysis …
- Welcome to State ofAIReport2025
- Excessive advancement of AI
- Hasty preemptive regulation may hinder innovation
- Ethical issues of AI
- Complete prohibition of technology
- A balanced approach between safety and innovation
- Strong retaliatory punishment
- US citizens recognized more benefits
- Chinese citizens recognized more benefits
- Perceptions in both countries were almost identical